In a thesis should, it is in many university guidelines, a current problem generally in accordance with the current state of research prepared analytically to about 40 to 50 pages, and (at least initially) be solved with their own thoughts. but how can you arrange all his thoughts so that a sufficient write my custom paper scientific criteria work comes out at?
The text outline and the structure of the thesis is, as in principle any scientific work, quasi the skeleton that support and structure provides. A good way to the first rough outline results from Mind Maps. The topic of the thesis should be graphically in the center, so that different branches can go in different directions – from those arising after some consideration and refinement often the main sub-headings 2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc. (As always the first is the introduction, it is absent in this listing) for each branch, in turn, can be more branches find out which is equal to or after some deliberation the breakdowns 2.1, 2.2, 3.1, 3.2 can emerge etc. Although a Mind Map therefore is extremely helpful for the first basic structure, its limit should be clear: they can not be fine division into more subdivisions as 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 because many subtleties only arise during the inferring-depth literature. ” / p The structural design of the thesis
The structural design of the thesis looks as usual as follows:
Cover / title page, with information about
- of Bachelor thesis
- the first and second corrector
- address and registration number of the author
- of the university, field of study and semesters
- with a detailed outline and page numbers
- style=”list-style: none”> part with the core aspects of the subject
- style=”list-style: none”> the
- and sources
First, the issue must be discussed in detail. to classify the subject not only in the tradition of the times, but also the current scientific discussion by the state of research is shown by means of groundbreaking works is important. Following this, the question has to be limited. For this it is important to stress the emphasis put aspects of the issue and to address key questions that occupy a key position in the bachelor thesis. Furthermore, can be explained in this context that some aspects could take a close look also for any reason but this provides no opportunity – usually it would overstretch the scope of the bachelor thesis or run too far away from the main theme. Furthermore, the relevance of the topic to be highlighted by also society and everyday discusses the importance to science, though.
the reflection of the theoretical frame of reference can now proceed. In social-scientific know-work is first necessary to clarify what science theoretical position one holds. On the one hand there is the normative-ontological perspective that conceives moral values as a central category of human social life and wants to implement accordingly and criticized supposedly immoral actions. On the other hand, you can also select the empirical-analytic approach. This focuses on a description and analysis of the reality as it is and not as it should be.
As a value-neutral approach it is here only to observe and pulling conclusions. The empirical-analytic approach can be extended by a historical-analytical component if you work a lot with historical sources from which derivatives and lessons for the present can be drawn. With either approach, the normative and empirical, it is clear that one can approach very differently to the same topic. The title – can in normative-ontological viewing an emphasis on the moral imperative of abolition of nuclear weapons, with which the whole civilization can be wiped out, place and Gorbachev’s disarmament readiness as “The disarmament of the US and Soviet Union since the Gorbachev era a political success?” exemplary praise. however, you choose the empirical-analytical approach, one takes no ratings willingness to bomb application, but rather compares mainly various statistics to reduce weapons numbers and takes this as the central question as a criterion for political success or failure.
The following is a more fundamental distinction must be made, in an actor-or system-theoretical approach. In the first of the individual is an actor and designer of his circumstances in focus. Thus, the above-mentioned exemplary work on the disarmament of the US and Soviet Union in the analysis can focus primarily on Bush and Gorbachev as the leading statesmen and policy guidelines donors. Equally, however, it is also possible to provide system-related mechanisms of power to the fore, by asking what options an individual politicians, be it ever so powerful within the political system of his country and the power system of international relations ever has. Many famous social science theories can locate in this scheme. The rational choice theory based on utility-maximizing and therefore selfish behavior of the individual, clearly one of the actor-theoretical considerations. The approach Niklas Luhmann, however, speaks of the autonomy and disengagement from difficult to be controlled subsystems, does not think in the categories of individual design power, but social structures and is therefore attributable to the system theoretical thinking.
Then keywords must be precisely defined. all researchers on basic social science concepts such as freedom, power or society do not agree, so help exact definitions in avoiding misunderstandings and stress the own scientific profundity.
Another part of the introduction has yet to explain the structure derBachelorarbeit by a brief look ahead is given to the main sub-sections and major subdivisions. Since the fine structure and with it major subdivisions in the course of work often change, it saves a lot of unnecessary work to write this section until the work is completed and established the text outline with it.
Finally, it should be noted that a good introduction makes up about 10 to 20 percent of the total work and therefore https://writingbee.com/ to meet the criteria, should be not less than four pages.
The entire introduction can be divided into three subdivisions, not to lose track of the many mentioned aspects of the approach. So should after the heading ‘1. follow 1.1 questioning and relevance “Introduction” equal to the section “. The section 1.2 could then be called simply “methodology” and the third “building work”. but the last two sections can be replaced.
2.2 main section
In the main part of the thesis, which should include at least 60 and at most 80 percent of the entire work, which expressed in the introduction guiding principle must be justified in a coherent argument.
Indispensable for this is a consistent argument, in which the individual arguments, even though they are separated by the breakdowns, give the inner unit. The criterion of science can only be achieved if individual arguments do not exclude logical, but complementary. Science and means to deal in depth with other positions, otherwise your thesis would not significantly different from a campaign speech or article on a par with the Bild newspaper. Surely you can reject interpretations of certain authors and feel some theoretical approach as useless, but this is only possible with a detailed justification why the rejects an approach that while preferred the others.
Finally, a discussion of the results must be made. Is the question in the foreground, as viable and meaningful are the results and how they can be used to answer the main question. What is also important to clarify whether the results can withstand further investigations and what further questions arise from the knowledge gained. Plus points can be collected by source-critical considerations to be made. If the representation in a historical source with three other conflicts or in case of empirical work it is clear that a statistic with two others may be rebutted, do not hesitate, this clearly point out.
As the introduction, it should also be a good conclusion make up 10 to 20 percent of the total volume of work. At the center is the summary of the results. As long and detailed explanations were given in the main part, they are not repeated here to the last detail, but are brought in brief to the point. The work should be completed by the conclusion, so there is no more space for new arguments or literature. The question raised in the introduction key question has to be addressed and answered clearly, so that the conclusions from the considerations of the main part become clear in Conclusion again. In Conclusion also a discussion of the results must be made, but not as the end of the main part in terms of the scientific value of the results, but in terms of social and political consequences resulting from the results of the work.
At the very end can still be briefly discussed whether from the results of approaches for developing the theme, for example, be won in the master work.
2.4 References and Bibliography
The formal requirements are basically the same ones that you already know from the first term papers here. Make sure that the details are identical to those in the literature and sources in the text. Also important is an exact division into the following areas:
- and documents: historical sources such as speeches, constitutional declarations, a UN resolution, original texts of classics or statistical material
- literature: monographs and publications in anthologies of
- can download a sample directory for your bachelor thesis download.
pattern document for the thesis pattern
directory-bachelorarbeit.pdf PDF document [58.2 KB]
3rd Special Tips
3.1 Well planned is half done
Perhaps you known through intensive training: failed to get a few practice sessions, it is all the more difficult to get motivated for the next and also you have the training residues first catch up. Similarly, it is the scientific work: one has started reading a book and then packing it away for a week, you have to read much again to understand the reasoning. This costs a lot of time, creates frustration and costs unnecessarily motivation. It is better to edit once commenced literature is over.
want to be
Well planned and regular breaks. After about two hours, the concentration can be gradually and it is advisable to switch off 15 or 30 minutes, to then go with a new mental freshness to work. In any case, it would be the wrong motivation to want to work four hours or even an entire evening – that our brains are simply not designed
In addition to these short-term and long-term scheduling are observed. There are two types of false temporal planning. At first, the author tends to slide because he thinks it’s still enough time. but the result is often a late start of work that can only be met by hectic and time pressure in the closing stages, of which it is the scientific depth and possibly the accuracy of the literature suffers. Therefore strongly encouraged to delay the start of work in no longer than necessary. In the second type, the author does not have this problem because he is thrilled and therefore highly motivated by his subject, so he starts the same. This is of course a very good attitude, but harbors a trick: just by the enthusiasm for a topic, you tend to follow from interest many cross-references and losing the guide out of sight, so the author at approach of the release date the same problem as threatened in the first case, namely a resultant of time pressure loss of quality.
3.2 Literature and Sources
For a science-based Bachelor thesis course include verifiable references of all direct and indirect quotations. Here you have the choice between the American citation with references in brackets in the text or in the footnote system. In most cases, no specification of a citation is done by the university, because both are scientifically equivalent.